Json.NET 3.0

Rating:        Based on 4 ratings
Reviewed:  3 reviews
Downloads: 9497
Released: Aug 24, 2008
Updated: Oct 26, 2008 by JamesNK
Dev status: Stable Help Icon

Recommended Download

Source Code Json.NET 3.0 (source + binary + documentation)
source code, 885K, uploaded Aug 24, 2008 - 9497 downloads

Release Notes

  • New feature - Silverlight Json.NET build.
  • New feature - JObject now implements IDictionary, JArray now implements IList.
  • New feature - Added JsonConverterAttribute. Used to define a JsonConverter to serialize a class or member. Can be placed on classes or fields and properties.
  • New feature - Added DateTimeFormat to IsoDateTimeConverter to customize date format.
  • New feature - Added WriteValue(object) overload to JsonWriter.
  • New feature - Added JTokenEqualityComparer.
  • New feature - Added IJEnumerable. JEnumerable and JToken now both implement IJEnumerable.
  • New feature - Added AsJEnumerable extension method.
  • Change - JsonSerializer does a case insensitive compare when matching property names and constructor params.
  • Change - JObject properties must have a unique name.
  • Bug fix - Internal string buffer properly resizes when parsing long JSON documents.
  • Bug fix - JsonWriter no longer errors in certain conditions when writing a JsonReader's position.
  • Bug fix - JsonSerializer skips multi-token properties when putting together constructor values.
  • Bug fix - Change IConvertible conversions to use ToXXXX methods rather than casting.
  • Bug fix - GetFieldsAndProperties now properly returns a distinct list of member names for classes than have overriden abstract generic properties.

Reviews for this release

     
thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks
by zuoann301 on Sep 18, 2010 at 3:15 AM
     
The version number on this project implies that it is designed for use with .Net 3.0, but this release depends on the .Net 3.5 framework. For those who are looking for a .Net 3.0 implementation, this isn't it. For what it is, it works pretty well however
by merrittgraves on Jul 30, 2010 at 1:26 PM
     
ok 非常好啊 找了很长时间了
by wangzan on Jun 24, 2009 at 11:46 PM